As for Palin, I think she's a great story - and has great symbolism (kid in Iraq, down syndrome, pregnant, hunts, small town, spunky, etc.) that will play well with suburban white women. She is good at giving speeches (sound familiar?). And she got only a million fewer people to watch her than Obama!! When she talked about herself she was interesting. However, her contradictions roll in every day (don't blame the press) and she sounded very typical when she began to distort Obama's record and butress her own (the "bridge to nowhere" comment).
Matthews made an interesting point saying that her nomination had nothing to do with HRC, but instead was to offer a direct contrast to the (percieved) elitism of the Obamas.
Still, I think a lot of non-interested, casual observer types (that WILL VOTE) see the pick as a gimmick.
The hypocracy of the Palin nomination is blatant. How many times do you hear GOP talking heads defending her "accomplisments" and "record" and "judgment" and arguing she's not an "empty suit" who got "lucky" and jumped ahead in line - over the same things they blame Obama for! There's no consistancy, and it doesn't pass the straight-face test (Rob Portman was touting her feats on city council!).
The convention makes me boil.
UPDATE: David Brody at CBN:
This speech was part mom, part Pit Bull and part policy wonk. I mean she went after Obama as hard as anyone. She basically ripped him to shreds but she didn’t do it in a way that looked mean or vindictive
UPDATE: Of course the NRO doesn't think it was mean at all:
More importantly, the speech tapped into a teeming reservoir of repressed rage. Memo to Barack Obama: You’re right, many of us are bitter. We are damn angry about being framed as “the American Taliban” because we love our country and think it’s exceptional as is; because we think you deal with evil by defeating it, not cozying up to it; because the change we think we need is a government that shrinks and gets out of the way, not a confiscatory, will-sapping Leviathan; because we don’t see “patriotism” as the willingness — the eagerness — to catalogue America’s flaws while never acknowledging her greatness; because when it comes to “reputation in the world,” we think it’s the “international community” not the United States that has a lot of catching up to do.
1 comment:
Thanks for your take on last night. My feelings exactly. It is sad but true that the low road usually works and has for the republicans for a long time. I like how John and Cindy go out of their way to talk high road and then allow in the case of John and smile and clap at, in the case of Cindy, what went on last night.
The two updates are a case in point how they just don't get it, it's "win at all costs" with a healthy dose of arrogance.
Post a Comment